Igor Sijsling vs Benjamin Ebrahimzadeh Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W W W L L L L
Form
W L L L W W W L L LHead-2-Head: Sijsling 1 - 0 Ebrahimzadeh
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sijsling winning 2 and Ebrahimzadeh winning 1. The last match between Sijsling and Ebrahimzadeh was at the Netherlands F2, 19-06-2006, First, Clay with Igor Sijsling getting the victory 2-6 6-1 3-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Igor Sijsling | 1 |
| Benjamin Ebrahimzadeh | 0 |
Netherlands F2(19-06-2006)
2
6
6
1
3
0
| Sijsling | Stats | Ebrahimzadeh |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 854 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 52 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 37 | Age | 45 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 20 | Titles | 1 |
| 58% (524-385) | Career Total W/L | 50% (60-60) |
| $716,195 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Draper VS Griekspoor PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Nishikori VS Shapovalov PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Sijsling VS Ebrahimzadeh H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-6 6-1 3-0 ret. | |||||
Sijsling VS Ebrahimzadeh H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 11 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Igor Sijsling Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Igor Sijsling
71%
(
60 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Igor Sijsling
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Igor Sijsling
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Franco Agamenone
Player
Igor Sijsling
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
52%
(
27 of
52)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Kaichi Uchida
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
6-2 2-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Daniel Siniakov
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Igor Sijsling
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Igor Sijsling
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
11
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
22 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Nicola Kuhn
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
53%
(
23 of
43)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
43
Total Points Won
34
|
7-5 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Benjamin Ebrahimzadeh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(4) 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (524/385) | Win/Loss | 50% (60/60) |
| 57% (1208/921) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (132/138) |
| 52% (10742/9721) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (1243/1285) |
| 53% (114/100) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) |
| 55% (162/132) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (24/31) |
| 64% (217/124) | Indoor Hard W/L | 56% (33/26) |
| 52% (31/29) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 3436 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1261 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 572.67 | Average Opponent Rank | 434.22 |
| 59% (24753/41711) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 74% (18199/24753) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (8477/16958) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (1644/3877) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (16242/42222) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (33/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (13/14) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43% (3/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (62/79) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (218/175) | Challenger W/L | 41% (11/16) |
| 70% (195/84) | Futures W/L | 54% (49/42) |
| 59% (501/854) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (57/113) |
| 39% (14/36) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 54% (185/344) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (22/43) |
| 48% (136/284) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (19/31) |
| 83% (535/445) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (55/47) |
| 17% (535/89) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (55/8) |
| 21% (373/78) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (65/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
